CVE-2026-48710

Description

Starlette is a lightweight ASGI framework/toolkit. Prior to version 1.0.1, the HTTP `Host` request header was not validated before being used to reconstruct `request.url`. Because the routing algorithm relies on the raw HTTP path while `request.url` is rebuilt from the `Host` header, a malformed header could make `request.url.path` differ from the path that was actually requested. Middleware and endpoints that apply security restrictions based on `request.url` (rather than the raw `scope` path) could therefore be bypassed. Users should upgrade to a version greater than or equal to version 1.0.1, which validates the `Host` header against the grammar of RFC 9112 §3.2 / RFC 3986 §3.2.2 when constructing `request.url` and falls back to `scope["server"]` for malformed values.

CVSS v3.1 Score

6.5

MEDIUM

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N

EPSS — Exploit Prediction

0.0003

Probability of exploitation

0.10%

Percentile rank

EPSS estimates the probability that this vulnerability will be exploited in the wild within the next 30 days. A higher score means more likely to be exploited.

Weakness Type (CWE)

CWE-444 CWE-444

References

Other References

https://badhost.org https://github.com/Kludex/starlette/commit/764dab0dcfb9033d75442d7a359645c9f94648c6 https://github.com/Kludex/starlette/security/advisories/GHSA-86qp-5c8j-p5mr https://github.com/pypa/advisory-database/tree/main/vulns/starlette/PYSEC-2026-161.yaml https://ostif.org/disclosing-the-badhost-vulnerability-in-starlette https://www.secwest.net/starlette https://www.x41-dsec.de/lab/advisories/x41-2026-002-starlette

Frequently Asked Questions

What is CVE-2026-48710? +

Starlette is a lightweight ASGI framework/toolkit. Prior to version 1.0.1, the HTTP `Host` request header was not validated before being used to reconstruct `request.url`. Because the routing algorithm relies on the raw HTTP path while `request.url` is rebuilt from the `Host` header, a malformed header could make `request.url.path` differ from the path that was actually requested. Middleware and endpoints that apply security restrictions based on `request.url` (rather than the raw `scope` path) could therefore be bypassed. Users should upgrade to a version greater than or equal to version 1.0.1, which validates the `Host` header against the grammar of RFC 9112 §3.2 / RFC 3986 §3.2.2 when constructing `request.url` and falls back to `scope["server"]` for malformed values. It has a CVSS v3.1 base score of 6.5 (MEDIUM).

How severe is CVE-2026-48710? +

CVE-2026-48710 has a CVSS v3.1 score of 6.5 out of 10, rated MEDIUM. This is a medium-severity vulnerability that should be remediated as part of regular maintenance. The EPSS score is 0.0003, placing it in the 0th percentile for exploitation probability.

How do I check if I'm vulnerable to CVE-2026-48710? +

You can use Secably's free Website Scanner to check your website for known vulnerabilities. For infrastructure scanning, use the Port Scanner to identify exposed services that may be affected. Check the vendor advisories linked above for specific patch and version information.

Related Vulnerabilities

CVE-2025-1867

Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests ('HTTP Request/Response Smuggling') vulnerability in ithewei libhv allows HTTP Response Smuggling.This issue affects libhv: through …

CVE-2024-23316

HTTP request desynchronization in Ping Identity PingAccess, all versions prior to 8.0.1 affected allows an attacker to send specially crafted …

CVE-2024-38494

This vulnerability allows a high-privileged authenticated PAM user to achieve remote command execution on the affected PAM system by sending …

CVE-2025-6999

An HTTP Request Smuggling [CWE-444] vulnerability in the Authentication portal of WatchGuard Fireware OS allows a remote attacker to evade …

CVE-2025-11915

Connection desynchronization between an HTTP proxy and the model backend. The fixes were rolled out for all proxies in front …

CVE-2023-53878

Member Login Script 3.3 contains a client-side desynchronization vulnerability that allows attackers to manipulate HTTP request handling by exploiting Content-Length …