CVE-2025-22010: linux kernel — Fix

Description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: RDMA/hns: Fix soft lockup during bt pages loop Driver runs a for-loop when allocating bt pages and mapping them with buffer pages. When a large buffer (e.g. MR over 100GB) is being allocated, it may require a considerable loop count. This will lead to soft lockup: watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#27 stuck for 22s! ... Call trace: hem_list_alloc_mid_bt+0x124/0x394 [hns_roce_hw_v2] hns_roce_hem_list_request+0xf8/0x160 [hns_roce_hw_v2] hns_roce_mtr_create+0x2e4/0x360 [hns_roce_hw_v2] alloc_mr_pbl+0xd4/0x17c [hns_roce_hw_v2] hns_roce_reg_user_mr+0xf8/0x190 [hns_roce_hw_v2] ib_uverbs_reg_mr+0x118/0x290 watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#35 stuck for 23s! ... Call trace: hns_roce_hem_list_find_mtt+0x7c/0xb0 [hns_roce_hw_v2] mtr_map_bufs+0xc4/0x204 [hns_roce_hw_v2] hns_roce_mtr_create+0x31c/0x3c4 [hns_roce_hw_v2] alloc_mr_pbl+0xb0/0x160 [hns_roce_hw_v2] hns_roce_reg_user_mr+0x108/0x1c0 [hns_roce_hw_v2] ib_uverbs_reg_mr+0x120/0x2bc Add a cond_resched() to fix soft lockup during these loops. In order not to affect the allocation performance of normal-size buffer, set the loop count of a 100GB MR as the threshold to call cond_resched().

Is your site exposed to CVE-2025-22010?

Run a free security scan — no signup, results in seconds.

CVSS v3.1 Score

5.5

MEDIUM

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Weakness Type (CWE)

CWE-667 CWE-667

Affected Products

Vendor	Product	Versions
linux	linux_kernel	5.3 — 6.1.132
linux	linux_kernel	6.2 — 6.6.85
linux	linux_kernel	6.7 — 6.12.21
linux	linux_kernel	6.13 — 6.13.9
linux	linux_kernel	All
linux	linux_kernel	All
linux	linux_kernel	All
linux	linux_kernel	All
linux	linux_kernel	All
linux	linux_kernel	All
linux	linux_kernel	All

References

Advisories & Patches

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/13a52f6c9ff99f7d88f81da535cb4e85eade662b https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/25655580136de59ec89f09089dd28008ea440fc9 https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/4104b0023ff66b5df900d23dbf38310893deca79 https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/975355faba56c0751292ed15a90c3e2c7dc0aad6 https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/9ab20fec7a1ce3057ad86afd27bfd08420b7cd11

Other References

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/461eb4ddede266df8f181f578732bb01742c3fd6 https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/efe544462fc0b499725364f90bd0f8bbf16f861a https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2025/05/msg00030.html https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2025/05/msg00045.html

Frequently Asked Questions

What is CVE-2025-22010? +

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: RDMA/hns: Fix soft lockup during bt pages loop Driver runs a for-loop when allocating bt pages and mapping them with buffer pages. When a large buffer (e.g. MR over 100GB) is being allocated, it may require a considerable loop count. This will lead to soft lockup: watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#27 stuck for 22s! ... Call trace: hem_list_alloc_mid_bt+0x124/0x394 [hns_roce_hw_v2] hns_roce_hem_list_request+0xf8/0x160 [hns_roce_hw_v2] hns_roce_mtr_create+0x2e4/0x360 [hns_roce_hw_v2] alloc_mr_pbl+0xd4/0x17c [hns_roce_hw_v2] hns_roce_reg_user_mr+0xf8/0x190 [hns_roce_hw_v2] ib_uverbs_reg_mr+0x118/0x290 watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#35 stuck for 23s! ... Call trace: hns_roce_hem_list_find_mtt+0x7c/0xb0 [hns_roce_hw_v2] mtr_map_bufs+0xc4/0x204 [hns_roce_hw_v2] hns_roce_mtr_create+0x31c/0x3c4 [hns_roce_hw_v2] alloc_mr_pbl+0xb0/0x160 [hns_roce_hw_v2] hns_roce_reg_user_mr+0x108/0x1c0 [hns_roce_hw_v2] ib_uverbs_reg_mr+0x120/0x2bc Add a cond_resched() to fix soft lockup during these loops. In order not to affect the allocation performance of normal-size buffer, set the loop count of a 100GB MR as the threshold to call cond_resched(). It has a CVSS v3.1 base score of 5.5 (MEDIUM).

How severe is CVE-2025-22010? +

CVE-2025-22010 has a CVSS v3.1 score of 5.5 out of 10, rated MEDIUM. This is a medium-severity vulnerability that should be remediated as part of regular maintenance.

What products are affected by CVE-2025-22010? +

CVE-2025-22010 affects products from linux, specifically: linux_kernel. Check the affected products table above for specific version ranges.

How do I check if I'm vulnerable to CVE-2025-22010? +

You can use Secably's free Website Scanner to check your website for known vulnerabilities. For infrastructure scanning, use the Port Scanner to identify exposed services that may be affected. Check the vendor advisories linked above for specific patch and version information.

Related Vulnerabilities

CVE-2025-1221

A Zigbee Radio Co-Processor (RCP), which is using SiLabs EmberZNet Zigbee stack, was unable to send messages to the host …

CVE-2025-10151

Improper locking vulnerability in Softing Industrial Automation GmbH gateways allows infected memory and/or resource leak exposure.This issue affects smartLink HW-PN: …

CVE-2026-54906 9.8

concurrent-ruby is a modern concurrency tools for Ruby. Prior to 1.3.7, Concurrent::ReadWriteLock#release_write_lock does not verify that the calling thread acquired …

CVE-2026-43215 8.8

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: cifs: Fix locking usage for tcon fields We used to …

CVE-2026-31629 8.8

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: nfc: llcp: add missing return after LLCP_CLOSED checks In nfc_llcp_recv_hdlc() …

CVE-2026-62426 8.8

[This CNA information record relates to multiple CVEs; the text explains which aspects/vulnerabilities correspond to which CVE.] To manage the …

CVE-2025-22010