CVE-2024-21610
MEDIUMDescription
An Improper Handling of Exceptional Conditions vulnerability in the Class of Service daemon (cosd) of Juniper Networks Junos OS allows an authenticated, network-based attacker with low privileges to cause a limited Denial of Service (DoS). In a scaled CoS scenario with 1000s of interfaces, when specific low privileged commands, received over NETCONF, SSH or telnet, are handled by cosd on behalf of mgd, the respective child management daemon (mgd) processes will get stuck. In case of (Netconf over) SSH this leads to stuck SSH sessions, so that when the connection-limit for SSH is reached, new sessions can't be established anymore. A similar behavior will be seen for telnet etc. Stuck mgd processes can be monitored by executing the following command: user@host> show system processes extensive | match mgd | match sbwait This issue affects Juniper Networks Junos OS: * All versions earlier than 20.4R3-S9; * 21.2 versions earlier than 21.2R3-S7; * 21.3 versions earlier than 21.3R3-S5; * 21.4 versions earlier than 21.4R3-S5; * 22.1 versions earlier than 22.1R3-S4; * 22.2 versions earlier than 22.2R3-S3; * 22.3 versions earlier than 22.3R3-S2; * 22.4 versions earlier than 22.4R3; * 23.2 versions earlier than 23.2R1-S2, 23.2R2.
Is your site exposed to CVE-2024-21610?
Run a free security scan — no signup, results in seconds.
CVSS v3.1 Score
Weakness Type (CWE)
Affected Products
| Vendor | Product |
|---|---|
| juniper | junos |
| juniper | junos |
| juniper | junos |
| juniper | junos |
| juniper | junos |
| juniper | junos |
| juniper | junos |
| juniper | junos |
| juniper | junos |
| juniper | junos |
| juniper | junos |
| juniper | junos |
| juniper | junos |
| juniper | junos |
| juniper | junos |
| juniper | junos |
| juniper | junos |
| juniper | junos |
| juniper | junos |
| juniper | junos |
| juniper | junos |
| juniper | junos |
| juniper | junos |
| juniper | junos |
| juniper | junos |
| juniper | junos |
| juniper | junos |
| juniper | junos |
| juniper | junos |
| juniper | junos |
| juniper | junos |
| juniper | junos |
| juniper | junos |
| juniper | junos |
| juniper | junos |
| juniper | junos |
| juniper | junos |
| juniper | junos |
| juniper | junos |
| juniper | junos |
| juniper | junos |
| juniper | junos |
| juniper | junos |
| juniper | junos |
| juniper | junos |
| juniper | junos |
| juniper | junos |
| juniper | junos |
| juniper | junos |
| juniper | junos |
| juniper | junos |
| juniper | junos |
| juniper | junos |
| juniper | junos |
| juniper | junos |
| juniper | junos |
| juniper | junos |
| juniper | junos |
| juniper | junos |
| juniper | junos |
| juniper | junos |
| juniper | junos |
| juniper | junos |
| juniper | junos |
| juniper | junos |
| juniper | junos |
| juniper | junos |
| juniper | junos |
| juniper | junos |
| juniper | junos |
| juniper | junos |
| juniper | junos |
| juniper | junos |
| juniper | junos |
| juniper | junos |
| juniper | junos |
| juniper | junos |
| juniper | junos |
| juniper | junos |
| juniper | junos |
| juniper | junos |
| juniper | junos |
| juniper | junos |
| juniper | junos |
| juniper | junos |
| juniper | junos |
| juniper | junos |
| juniper | junos |
| juniper | junos |
| juniper | junos |
| juniper | junos |
| juniper | junos |
| juniper | junos |
| juniper | junos |
| juniper | mx |
| juniper | mx10 |
| juniper | mx10000 |
| juniper | mx10003 |
| juniper | mx10004 |
| juniper | mx10008 |
| juniper | mx10016 |
| juniper | mx104 |
| juniper | mx150 |
| juniper | mx2008 |
| juniper | mx2010 |
| juniper | mx2020 |
| juniper | mx204 |
| juniper | mx240 |
| juniper | mx304 |
| juniper | mx40 |
| juniper | mx480 |
| juniper | mx5 |
| juniper | mx80 |
| juniper | mx960 |
References
Frequently Asked Questions
What is CVE-2024-21610? +
How severe is CVE-2024-21610? +
What products are affected by CVE-2024-21610? +
How do I check if I'm vulnerable to CVE-2024-21610? +
Related Vulnerabilities
A denial-of-service vulnerability exists in the affected products. The vulnerability could allow a remote, non-privileged user to send malicious requests …
Tonic is a native gRPC client & server implementation with async/await support. When using tonic::transport::Server there is a remote DoS …
A security issue exists within the Studio 5000 Logix Designer add-on profile (AOP) for the ArmorStart Classic distributed motor controller, …
loona is an experimental, HTTP/1.1 and HTTP/2 implementation in Rust on top of io-uring. `loona-hpack` suffers from the same vulnerability …
Team ENVY, a Security Research TEAM has found a flaw that allows for a remote code execution on the NVR. …
Routinator exits on any error when accepting incoming HTTP or RTR connections, including ones it can recover from such as …