CVE-2023-6937
MEDIUMDescription
wolfSSL prior to 5.6.6 did not check that messages in one (D)TLS record do not span key boundaries. As a result, it was possible to combine (D)TLS messages using different keys into one (D)TLS record. The most extreme edge case is that, in (D)TLS 1.3, it was possible that an unencrypted (D)TLS 1.3 record from the server containing first a ServerHello message and then the rest of the first server flight would be accepted by a wolfSSL client. In (D)TLS 1.3 the handshake is encrypted after the ServerHello but a wolfSSL client would accept an unencrypted flight from the server. This does not compromise key negotiation and authentication so it is assigned a low severity rating.
Is your site exposed to CVE-2023-6937?
Run a free security scan — no signup, results in seconds.
CVSS v3.1 Score
Weakness Type (CWE)
Affected Products
| Vendor | Product |
|---|---|
| wolfssl | wolfssl |
References
Frequently Asked Questions
What is CVE-2023-6937? +
How severe is CVE-2023-6937? +
What products are affected by CVE-2023-6937? +
How do I check if I'm vulnerable to CVE-2023-6937? +
Related Vulnerabilities
Zervit's portable HTTP/web server is vulnerable to remote DoS attacks when a configuration reset request is made. The vulnerability is …
A security flaw was discovered in certain NETGEAR Nighthawk RAX series routers that could allow someone already logged in to …
Penetration Testing engineers at Amazon have discovered a flaw where the camera system fails to properly handle data supplied in …
n8n before version 2.10.0 contains an input validation vulnerability in the Guardrail node that allows attackers to bypass default guardrail …
A Denial of Service (DoS) vulnerability exists in the Protobuf PHP library during the parsing of untrusted input. Maliciously structured …
In Bouncy Castle for Java before 1.85, MTI/A0 DH agreement exponentiates unvalidated peer value. This issue also affects Bouncy Castle …